BIJDZ5071 BIJDZ5071
  • 10-09-2017
  • Social Studies
contestada

One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress.

Respuesta :

SeoJoon15
SeoJoon15 SeoJoon15
  • 21-09-2017
The answer is no, the person who acts in a manner that is very annoying but not threatening can't be liable for the infliction of emotional distress because in order to inflict emotional distress, the person should be threatening and not just plainly annoying towards others.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Which measurement is the best estimate for the mass of an elephant? I just feel like asking and giving extra points. You better answer honestly or I report u. T
Which of the symbols correctly relates the two numbers below? Check all that apply. 25 ? 35
What role does gravity play in the erosion cycle
CAD helps professionals to _____.
wide angle ,normal,telephoto are types of
Who was MOST responsible for the victory at Trenton? General Washington Second Continental Congress British government unofficial colonial groups French armed f
I don't understand inequalities.
What does using the rule of thirds allow you to do?
Please answer those three
Golgi apparatus is to vacuole as packaging is to